نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
Assistant Professor of Public Administration, Shahid Beheshti University
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر تحلیل چالشهای اجرای برنامههای اصلاح نظام اداری است. برای دستیابی به این هدف، پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و مبتنی بر نظریه مبنایی انجام شد. دادهها از طریق مصاحبه با کنشگران حوزه اصلاح نظام اداری و با روش نمونهگیری هدفمند جمعآوری شد و فرآیند گردآوری تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری ادامه یافت. مصاحبهها پس از پیادهسازی، به شیوه کدگذاری نظاممند تحلیل شدند. یافتهها بر اساس رهیافت نظاممند اشتراوس و کوربین نشان داد که «فعال نبودن عرصه سیاست» بهعنوان پدیده محوری قابلشناسایی است. شرایط علّی شامل «ابهام در نظام حکمرانی کشور» و «ابهام در دوگانگی سیاست و اداره»، شرایط زمینهای شامل «اثرات محیط کلان» و «فرهنگ برنامه ناپذیری» و شرایط مداخلهگر شامل «ضعف در نظام برنامهریزی» و «ضعف در نهاد برنامهریزی اصلاح نظام اداری» هستند. در واکنش به این شرایط، راهبردهایی نظیر «تدوین برنامه صرفاً برای داشتن برنامه» و «تقلید از مدلهای خارجی» اتخاذ میشود. درنهایت، «پایین بودن قابلیت اجرا» و «ضعف در نظام ارزیابی» بهعنوان پیامدهای اصلی این فرآیند شناسایی شدند. این نتایج ضمن تبیین نظاممند موانع اصلاحات اداری، نشاندهنده ضرورت توجه به تقویت نهادهای برنامهریزی و ایجاد سازوکارهای پایدار برای افزایش کارایی و اثربخشی سیاستها در نظام اداری است.
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
Analysis of the Challenges of Implementing Administrative Reform Programs in Iran Using the Grounded Theory Approach
نویسنده [English]
- Rasoul Motazedian
استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
چکیده [English]
The present study seeks to analyze the challenges associated with the implementation of administrative reform programs. To accomplish this objective, the research was conducted using a qualitative approach grounded in grounded theory methodology. Data were gathered through interviews with key actors in the field of administrative reform, employing purposive sampling. The data collection process continued until theoretical saturation was reached. After transcription, the interviews were analyzed using systematic coding procedures. Based on the Strauss and Corbin systematic approach, the findings identified the “inactive role of the political sphere” as the core phenomenon. The causal conditions include ambiguity in the national governance system and ambiguity in the dual relationship between politics and administration. The contextual conditions encompass macro-environmental influences and a culture characterized by weak commitment to programmatic planning. The intervening conditions consist of deficiencies in the planning system and weaknesses within the institutional body responsible for administrative reform planning. In response to these conditions, strategies such as formulating plans merely for symbolic compliance and imitating foreign models are adopted. Ultimately, limited implementation capacity and weaknesses in the evaluation system were identified as the primary consequences of this process. These findings provide a systematic explanation of the barriers to administrative reform and underscore the necessity of strengthening planning institutions and establishing sustainable mechanisms to enhance policy efficiency and effectiveness within the administrative system.
کلیدواژهها [English]
- Iran's administrative reforms
- Implementation challenges
- Developing countries
- Grounded theory
- بابایی، سحر، واعظی، رضا، پورعزت، علیاصغر (1403). ارائه چارچوبی برای تسهیلگرها و پیشرانهای اصلاح نظام اداری ایران،فصلنامه علمی دانش حکمرانی، 2(4)، 30-52. doi: 10.22034/jokog.2025.491738.1027
- رهنورد، فرج اله (1402). اصلاح اداری مبتنی بر حکمرانی عمومی.مطالعات مدیریت خدمات عمومی، 1(1)، 49-53. doi: 10.22054/spsa.2023.71237.1008
- سازمان اداری و استخدامی کشور (1401). گزارش اجرای برنامههای اصلاح اداری.
- شهرآئینی، سیدمجتبی، امیری، مجتبی، قلی پور سوته، رحمت اله، میرباقری، سیدمحسن، بابایی مجرد، حسین (1403). چالشهای فراروی برنامههای اصلاح نظام اداری در ایران با تمرکز بر اصلاح ساختاری،اندیشه مدیریت راهبردی، (2) 18، 37-88. doi: 10.30497/smt.2025.245334.3522
- مرکز پژوهشهای مجلس شورای اسلامی (1397). تحلیل پیشینه اصلاح نظام اداری در ایران.
- Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action. Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/26994
- Andersen, H. T. (2008). The emerging Danish government reform – centralised decentralisation. Urban Research & Practice, 1(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535060701795298
- Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12238
- Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/constructing-grounded-theory/book255601
- Cohen, N. (2023). Public administration reform and political will in cases of political instability: Insights from the Israeli experience. Public Policy and Administration, 38(4), 405-423. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09520767221076059
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/basics-of-qualitative-research/toc
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. fifth edition. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/research-design-6-270550
- Danaeefard, H. and Golverdi, M. (2024) ‘Governance and Administrative Reforms in Contemporary Iran: Challenges and Opportunities’, in A. Farazmand (ed.) Comparative Governance Reforms: Assessing the Past and Exploring the Future. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 235–264. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-70306-5_13
- Demir, T., & Nyhan, R. C. (2008). The politics-administration dichotomy: An empirical search for correspondence between theory and practice. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 81–96. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25145579
- Dong, L. (2015). Public Administration Theories: Instrumental and Value Rationalities, New York: Palgrave MacMillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137536426
- Farasatkhah, M., Ghazi, M. and Bazargan, A. (2008) ‘Quality Challenge in Iran’s Higher Education: A Historical Review’, Iranian Studies, 41(2), pp. 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00210860801913321
- Farazmand, A. (1999). Administrative reform in modern Iran: an historical analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 22(6), 917–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699908525410
- Farazmand, A. (2002). Administrative Reform in Developing Nations. Praeger. https://www.amazon.com/Administrative-Reform-Developing-Nations-Farazmand/dp/0275972127
- Gheissari, A. (2016). Iran’s Dialectic of the Enlightenment: Constitutional Experience, Transregional Connections and Conflicting Narratives of Modernity. Iran’s Constitutional Revolution of, 15-47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1m3p32s
- Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 8(4), 597-607. https://methods.sagepub.com/hnbk/edvol/the-handbook-of-social-work-research-methods/chpt/reliability-validity-qualitative-research
- Ingrams, A., Piotrowski, S., & Berliner, D. (2020). Learning from our mistakes: public management reform and the hope of open government. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(4), 257-272. https://academic.oup.com/ppmg/article/3/4/257/5721733
- Katouzian, H. (2020). Iran’s Long History and Short-Term Society. International Journal of New Political Economy, 1(1), 23-34. doi: 10.29252/jep.1.1.23
- Kitchen, R. (1989). Administrative reform in Jamaica: A component of structural adjustment. Public Administration and Development, 9(4), 339-355. https://wiley.scienceconnect.io/api/oauth/authorize?ui
- Klemsdal, L., Andreassen, T. A., & Breit, E. (2022). Resisting or facilitating change? How street-level managers’ situational work contributes to the implementation of public reforms. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(4), 736-749. https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article/32/4/736/6515913
- Lee, C. P., Hung, M. J., & Chen, D. Y. (2022). Factors affecting citizen satisfaction: examining from the perspective of the expectancy disconfirmation theory and individual differences. Asian Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 35-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2022.2047081
- McGuire, L. (2001). Service Charters-global convergence or national divergence? A comparison of initiatives in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Public Management Review, 3(4), 493–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616670110071856
- McLeod, Thos. H. & Field Supervisor. (1964). National Planning in Iran: A report based on the experiences of the Harvard Advisory Group in Iran. Sask. https://vdoc.pub/documents/national-planning-in-iran-a-report-based-on-the-experiences-of-the-harvard-advisory-group-in-iran-3uv43j2gjns0
- Meier, K. J., Compton, M., Polga-Hecimovich, J., Song, M., & Wimpy, C. (2019). Bureaucracy and the failure of politics: Challenges to democratic governance. Administration & Society, 51(10), 1576-1605. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0095399719874759
- Neshkova, M. I., & Kostadinova, T. (2012). The effectiveness of administrative reform in new democracies. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 324-333. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41506776
- Ngouo, L. B. (2017). The World Bank’s approach to public sector management for 2011–2020: proposals to push forward the debate. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 541-562. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020852315591645
- Ohemeng, F. L. (2010). The dangers of internationalization and “one‐size‐fits‐all” in public sector management: Lessons from performance management policies in Ontario and Ghana.International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(5), 456-478. https://www.emerald.com/ijpsm/article-pdf/23/5/456/1032860/09513551011058484.pdf
- Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
- Painter, M. (2003). Public administration reform in Vietnam: problems and prospects. Public Administration and Development, 23(3), 259-271. https://wiley.scienceconnect.io/api/oauth/authorize?ui_
- Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford university press.
- Pyun, H.-O., & Edey Gamassou, C. (2018). Looking for Public Administration Theories? Public Organization Review, 18(2), 245–261. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11115-017-0374-6
- Quah, J. S. T. (2010). Chapter 7 Administrative reform. In J. S. T. Quah (Ed.), Public Administration Singapore-style (Vol. 19, pp. 127–146). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://www.emerald.com/books/edited-volume/14975/chapter/86113133/Chapter-7-Administrative-reform
- Rinnert, D. (2015). The politics of civil service and administrative reforms in development—Explaining within‐country variation of reform outcomes in Georgia after the Rose revolution. Public administration and development, 35(1), 19-33. https://wiley.scienceconnect.io/api/oauth/authorize?ui
- Siami-Namini, S. (2020). The new public management: administrative reform in Iran. Available at SSRN 3534437. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6452965/
- Siddiquee, N. A., Xavier, J. A., & Mohamed, M. Z. (2019). What Works and Why? Lessons from Public Management Reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1390762
- Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0275074005282583
- Theodoulou, S. Z., & Roy, R. K. (2016). Public administration : a very short introduction. Oxford. https://academic.oup.com/book/559
- Thomassen, J. P., Ahaus, K., Van de Walle, S., & Nabitz, U. (2014). An Implementation Framework for Public Service Charters: Results of a concept mapping study. Public Management Review, 16(4), 570–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.726062
- Ugyel, L. (2016). Paradigms and Public Sector Reform: Public Administration of Bhutan (1st ed.). Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-40280-2
- Van de Walle, S. (2018). Explaining Citizen Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Public Services BT - The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe (E. Ongaro & S. Van Thiel (eds.); pp. 227–241). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/a98b40c7-b652-4b6c-8c6c-0c0c651e5a54
- Van der Voet, J., Kuipers, B. S., & Groeneveld, S. (2016). A Change Management Perspective. In Theory and Practice of Public Sector Reform (first, pp. 79–99). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315714141-7/change-management-perspective-joris-van-der-voet-ben-kuipers-sandra-groeneveld
- Wettenhall, R. (2013). A critique of the “administrative reform industry”: reform is important, but so is stability. Teaching Public Administration, 31(2), 149-164. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0144739413488904
- Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political science quarterly, 2(2), 197-222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2139277
- World Bank. (1999). Civil service reform: A review of World Bank assistance. Report 19211. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/915991468781146151/pdf/multi-page.pdf
)