Document Type : Original Article

Author

استادیار گروه مدیریت دولتی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی

Abstract

The present study seeks to analyze the challenges associated with the implementation of administrative reform programs. To accomplish this objective, the research was conducted using a qualitative approach grounded in grounded theory methodology. Data were gathered through interviews with key actors in the field of administrative reform, employing purposive sampling. The data collection process continued until theoretical saturation was reached. After transcription, the interviews were analyzed using systematic coding procedures. Based on the Strauss and Corbin systematic approach, the findings identified the “inactive role of the political sphere” as the core phenomenon. The causal conditions include ambiguity in the national governance system and ambiguity in the dual relationship between politics and administration. The contextual conditions encompass macro-environmental influences and a culture characterized by weak commitment to programmatic planning. The intervening conditions consist of deficiencies in the planning system and weaknesses within the institutional body responsible for administrative reform planning. In response to these conditions, strategies such as formulating plans merely for symbolic compliance and imitating foreign models are adopted. Ultimately, limited implementation capacity and weaknesses in the evaluation system were identified as the primary consequences of this process. These findings provide a systematic explanation of the barriers to administrative reform and underscore the necessity of strengthening planning institutions and establishing sustainable mechanisms to enhance policy efficiency and effectiveness within the administrative system.

Keywords

  1. Andrews, M., Pritchett, L., & Woolcock, M. (2017). Building state capability: Evidence, analysis, action. Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/26994
  2. Andersen, H. T. (2008). The emerging Danish government reform – centralised decentralisation. Urban Research & Practice1(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535060701795298
  3. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445–456. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.12238
  4. Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/constructing-grounded-theory/book255601
  5. Cohen, N. (2023). Public administration reform and political will in cases of political instability: Insights from the Israeli experience. Public Policy and Administration38(4), 405-423. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09520767221076059
  6. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage. https://methods.sagepub.com/book/mono/basics-of-qualitative-research/toc
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods. fifth edition. https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/research-design-6-270550
  8. Danaeefard, H. and Golverdi, M. (2024) ‘Governance and Administrative Reforms in Contemporary Iran: Challenges and Opportunities’, in A. Farazmand (ed.) Comparative Governance Reforms: Assessing the Past and Exploring the Future. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 235–264. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-70306-5_13
  9. Demir, T., & Nyhan, R. C. (2008). The politics-administration dichotomy: An empirical search for correspondence between theory and practice. Public Administration Review, 68(1), 81–96. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25145579
  10. Dong, L. (2015). Public Administration Theories: Instrumental and Value Rationalities, New York: Palgrave MacMillan. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1057/9781137536426
  11. Farasatkhah, M., Ghazi, M. and Bazargan, A. (2008) ‘Quality Challenge in Iran’s Higher Education: A Historical Review’, Iranian Studies, 41(2), pp. 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00210860801913321
  12. Farazmand, A. (1999). Administrative reform in modern Iran: an historical analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 22(6), 917–946. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699908525410
  13. Farazmand, A. (2002). Administrative Reform in Developing Nations. Praeger. https://www.amazon.com/Administrative-Reform-Developing-Nations-Farazmand/dp/0275972127
  14. Gheissari, A. (2016). Iran’s Dialectic of the Enlightenment: Constitutional Experience, Transregional Connections and Conflicting Narratives of Modernity. Iran’s Constitutional Revolution of, 15-47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1m3p32s
  15. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report8(4), 597-607. https://methods.sagepub.com/hnbk/edvol/the-handbook-of-social-work-research-methods/chpt/reliability-validity-qualitative-research
  16. Ingrams, A., Piotrowski, S., & Berliner, D. (2020). Learning from our mistakes: public management reform and the hope of open government. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(4), 257-272. https://academic.oup.com/ppmg/article/3/4/257/5721733
  17. Katouzian, H. (2020). Iran’s Long History and Short-Term Society. International Journal of New Political Economy1(1), 23-34. doi: 10.29252/jep.1.1.23
  18. Kitchen, R. (1989). Administrative reform in Jamaica: A component of structural adjustment. Public Administration and Development9(4), 339-355. https://wiley.scienceconnect.io/api/oauth/authorize?ui
  19. Klemsdal, L., Andreassen, T. A., & Breit, E. (2022). Resisting or facilitating change? How street-level managers’ situational work contributes to the implementation of public reforms. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 32(4), 736-749. https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article/32/4/736/6515913
  20. Lee, C. P., Hung, M. J., & Chen, D. Y. (2022). Factors affecting citizen satisfaction: examining from the perspective of the expectancy disconfirmation theory and individual differences. Asian Journal of Political Science30(1), 35-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2022.2047081
  21. McGuire, L. (2001). Service Charters-global convergence or national divergence? A comparison of initiatives in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Public Management Review, 3(4), 493–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616670110071856
  22. McLeod, Thos. H. & Field Supervisor. (1964). National Planning in Iran: A report based on the experiences of the Harvard Advisory Group in Iran. Sask. https://vdoc.pub/documents/national-planning-in-iran-a-report-based-on-the-experiences-of-the-harvard-advisory-group-in-iran-3uv43j2gjns0
  23. Meier, K. J., Compton, M., Polga-Hecimovich, J., Song, M., & Wimpy, C. (2019). Bureaucracy and the failure of politics: Challenges to democratic governance. Administration & Society51(10), 1576-1605. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0095399719874759
  24. Neshkova, M. I., & Kostadinova, T. (2012). The effectiveness of administrative reform in new democracies. Public Administration Review72(3), 324-333. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41506776
  25. Ngouo, L. B. (2017). The World Bank’s approach to public sector management for 2011–2020: proposals to push forward the debate. International Review of Administrative Sciences83(3), 541-562. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020852315591645
  26. Ohemeng, F. L. (2010). The dangers of internationalization and “one‐size‐fits‐all” in public sector management: Lessons from performance management policies in Ontario and Ghana.International Journal of Public Sector Management23(5), 456-478. https://www.emerald.com/ijpsm/article-pdf/23/5/456/1032860/09513551011058484.pdf
  27. Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030600853022
  28. Painter, M. (2003). Public administration reform in Vietnam: problems and prospects. Public Administration and Development23(3), 259-271. https://wiley.scienceconnect.io/api/oauth/authorize?ui_
  29. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-into the age of austerity. Oxford university press.
  30. Pyun, H.-O., & Edey Gamassou, C. (2018). Looking for Public Administration Theories? Public Organization Review, 18(2), 245–261. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11115-017-0374-6
  31. Quah, J. S. T. (2010). Chapter 7 Administrative reform. In J. S. T. Quah (Ed.), Public Administration Singapore-style (Vol. 19, pp. 127–146). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://www.emerald.com/books/edited-volume/14975/chapter/86113133/Chapter-7-Administrative-reform
  32. Rinnert, D. (2015). The politics of civil service and administrative reforms in development—Explaining within‐country variation of reform outcomes in Georgia after the Rose revolution. Public administration and development35(1), 19-33. https://wiley.scienceconnect.io/api/oauth/authorize?ui
  33. Siami-Namini, S. (2020). The new public management: administrative reform in Iran. Available at SSRN 3534437. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6452965/
  34. Siddiquee, N. A., Xavier, J. A., & Mohamed, M. Z. (2019). What Works and Why? Lessons from Public Management Reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1390762
  35. Stoker, G. (2006). Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? The American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 41–57. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0275074005282583
  36. Theodoulou, S. Z., & Roy, R. K. (2016). Public administration : a very short introduction. Oxford. https://academic.oup.com/book/559
  37. Thomassen, J. P., Ahaus, K., Van de Walle, S., & Nabitz, U. (2014). An Implementation Framework for Public Service Charters: Results of a concept mapping study. Public Management Review, 16(4), 570–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.726062
  38. Ugyel, L. (2016). Paradigms and Public Sector Reform: Public Administration of Bhutan (1st ed.). Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-40280-2
  39. Van de Walle, S. (2018). Explaining Citizen Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Public Services BT - The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe (E. Ongaro & S. Van Thiel (eds.); pp. 227–241). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/retrieve/a98b40c7-b652-4b6c-8c6c-0c0c651e5a54
  40. Van der Voet, J., Kuipers, B. S., & Groeneveld, S. (2016). A Change Management Perspective. In Theory and Practice of Public Sector Reform (first, pp. 79–99). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315714141-7/change-management-perspective-joris-van-der-voet-ben-kuipers-sandra-groeneveld
  41. Wettenhall, R. (2013). A critique of the “administrative reform industry”: reform is important, but so is stability. Teaching Public Administration31(2), 149-164. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0144739413488904
  42. Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. Political science quarterly2(2), 197-222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2139277
  43. World Bank. (1999). Civil service reform: A review of World Bank assistance. Report 19211. https://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/915991468781146151/pdf/multi-page.pdf
  44. Administrative and Recruitment Affairs Organization of Iran (2022). Report on the Implementation of Administrative Reform Programs. [In Persian]
  45. Babaei, S., Vaezi, R., Pourezzat, A., A. (2024). Providing a Framework for Facilitators and Drivers of Reforming Iran's Administrative System. Quarterly Journal of Governance Knowledge2(4), 30-52. doi: 10.22034/jokog.2025.491738.1027[In Persian]
  46. Islamic Parliament Research Center of Iran (2018). Analysis of the History of Administrative Reform in Iran.
  47. Shahraeini, S., Amiry, M., Souteh, R., Mirbagheri, S., Babaee Mojarrad, H. (2024). Challenges Faced Administrative system Reform Plans in Iran by focusing on structural reform. Strategic Management Thought18(2), 37-88. doi: 10.30497/smt.2025.245334.3522 [In Persian]
  48. Rahnavard, F. (2023). Administrative Reform based on Public Governance. Studies in Public Service Administration, 1(1), 53-94. doi: 10.22054/spsa.2023.71237.1008[In Persian]