مطالعات مدیریت خدمات عمومی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

فایل ها

شناسایی پیشایندها و پسایندهای رضایت شهروندان از خدمات عمومی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانش آموخته دکتری مدیریت دولتی دانشکده مدیریت وحسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

10.22054/spsa.2024.78484.1036

چکیده

بسیاری از ابتکارات اصلاحی بخش خدمات عمومی به‌طور آشکار بین نیاز به اصلاح خدمات عمومی، بهبود رضایت شهروندان از خدمات عمومی و حفظ یا احیای اعتماد به دولت ارتباط برقرار می‌کنند. در همین راستا، سنجش رضایت شهروندان از خدمات عمومی نشانگر آن است که بخش دولتی به‌طور فزاینده‌ای رضایت شهروندان را در مرکز توجه خود قرار داده است. از زمان برقراری این مکانیسم، پژوهش‌های زیادی در این زمینه انجام شده است و شاهد انباشت دانش در این حوزه هستیم. ازاین‌رو، با توجه به مرورهای گذشته خلأ انجام یک مطالعه فراترکیب به‌عنوان یکی از روش‌های فرا مطالعه ضروری است. برای این منظور، بر روی پایگاه استنادی اسکوپوس در بازه سال‌های 1973 تا 2022 تعداد 671 مقاله استخراج شد که پس از پالایش آن‌ها، نهایتاً بر روی 32 مقاله تحلیل انجام شد. بر اساس نتایج پژوهش، مهم‌ترین پیشایندهای رضایت شهروندی عبارت‌اند از: فرایند ارائه خدمت، اطلاعات ارائه شده در مورد خدمت، خدمات مشتری (خدمات حضوری)، وب‌سایت‌ها (خدمات غیرحضوری) و انتظارات کلی. همچنین، مهم‌ترین پسایندهای رضایت شهروندی عبارت‌اند از: اعتماد به دولت و شکایت از خدمت دریافتی. بر اساس پیشایندها و پیامدهای شناسایی شده، مدل اولیه‌ای از رضایت شهروندان از خدمات عمومی ارائه شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying the Antecedents and Consequences of Citizens' Satisfaction with Public Services

نویسنده [English]

  • Rasoul Motazedian

PhD Graduate in Public Administration from the Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University ,Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Many administrative reform initiatives have explicitly made a connection between the need to reform public services, improving citizen satisfaction with public services, and maintaining or restore the public trust in government. In this regard, the measurement of citizens' satisfaction with public services shows that the public sector has increasingly placed citizens' satisfaction in the center of its attention. Since the establishment of this mechanism, a lot of research has been done in this field and we are witnessing the accumulation of knowledge in this field. Therefore, according to the previous reviews, it is necessary to conduct a meta- synthesis study as one of the meta-study methods. For this purpose, a number of 671 articles were extracted from the Scopus citation database between 1973 and 2022, and after refining them, analysis was finally performed on 32 articles. According to the results of the research, the most important antecedents of citizen satisfaction are: service delivery process, information provided about the service, customer service (face-to-face service), websites (off-site service) and general expectations. Also, the most important consequences of citizen satisfaction are: trust in the government and complaints about the service received. Based on the identified antecedents and consequences, a preliminary model of citizens' satisfaction with public services was presented.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "citizen"
  • "satisfaction"
  • "public". "services"
  • "meta-synthesis"
  • "study"
مراجع
  1. طرح تکریم مردم و جلب رضایت ارباب‌رجوع در نظام اداری (1381). مصوبه شورای عالی اداری.
  2. واعظی، رضا؛ شمس، لیلا؛ ملکی، مصطفی (1402). فراحکمرانی: نظریه‌ای برای حفظ و ارتقاء ارزش و خدمات عمومی، مطالعات مدیریت خدمات عمومی، 1(1)، 157-185. doi: 10.22054/spsa.2022.66621.1002
  3. Badri, M., Al Khaili, M., & Al Mansoori, R. L. (2015). Quality of service, expectation, satisfaction and trust in public institutions: the Abu Dhabi citizen satisfaction survey. Asian Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 420-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2015.1055773
  4. Bente, F. M. (2014). Ethnicity and Citizen Satisfaction: A Study on Local Public Administration. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 1324-1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00595-4
  5. Bouckaert, G., Van de Walle, S., & Kampen, J. K. (2005). Potential for comparative public opinion research in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305053882
  6. Carvalho, C., Brito, C., & Cabral, J. S. (2010). Towards a conceptual model for assessing the quality of public services. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 7(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-010-0046-5
  7. Chatfield, A., & AlAnazi, J. (2013). Service quality, citizen satisfaction, and loyalty with self-service delivery options to transforming e-government services.
  8. Chatzoglou, P., Chatzoudes, D., Vraimaki, E., & Leivaditou, E. (2014). Measuring citizen satisfaction using the SERVQUAL approach: the case of the ‘Hellenic post’. Procedia Economics and Finance, 9, 349-360. https://doi.org/1016/S2212-5671(14)00036-7
  9. Clark, D. (2000). Citizens, charters and public service reform in France and Britain. Government and Opposition, 35(2), 152–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.00021
  10. Dahlström, C., Nistotskaya, M., & Tyrberg, M. (2018). Outsourcing, bureaucratic personnel quality and citizen satisfaction with public services. Public Administration, 96(1), 218-233. https://doi.org/1111/padm.12387
  11. Davoudpour, Z., & Rezapour, M. (2016). The conceptual model of the relationship between institutional transparency, citizen trust and satisfaction (A case study of Tehran city, Iran).  J. Architect. Eng. Urban Plan, 26(2), 131-139. https://doi.org/10.22068/ijaup.26.2.131
  12. Ferdik, F., Frogge, G., & Cooney, M. (2022). Exploring further determinants of citizen satisfaction with the police: The role of strain. Journal of criminal justice, 81, 101931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2022.101931
  13. Gendel-Guterman, H., & Billig, M. (2021). Increasing citizen satisfaction with municipal services: the function of intangible factors. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 18, 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-020-00267-y
  14. Im, T., & Lee, S. J. (2012). Does management performance impact citizen satisfaction?. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(4), 419-436.
    https://doi.org/1177/027507401140858
  15. Karagianni, T., & Theriou, G.N. (2018). Service quality in local government and its effect on citizen satisfaction: The case of the Division of Transportation and Communications of the Regional Unit of Kavala in the region of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace, Greece. International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research, 11, 7-16. https://doi.org/10.25103/ijbesar.112.01
  16. Kim, H. J. (2006). Measuring Citizen Satisfaction with Contracted-Out Public Service Quality: An Application of Servqual Measures. International Review of Public Administration, 11(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2003.10805081
  17. Kundo, H. K. (2018). Citizen’s Charter for Improved Public Service Delivery and Accountability: The Experience of Land Administration at the Local Government in Bangladesh. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(3), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1262872
  18. Lee, C. P., Hung, M. J., & Chen, D. Y. (2022). Factors affecting citizen satisfaction: examining from the perspective of the expectancy disconfirmation theory and individual differences. Asian Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 35-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2022.2047081
  19. Ma, L. (2017). Performance management and citizen satisfaction with the government: Evidence from Chinese municipalities. Public Administration, 95(1), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12275
  20. McGuire, L. (2001). Service Charters-global convergence or national divergence? A comparison of initiatives in Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. Public Management Review, 3(4), 493–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616670110071856
  21. Mizrahi, S., Cohen, N., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2020). Government’s social responsibility, citizen satisfaction and trust. Policy & Politics, 48(3), 443-460. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557320X15837138439319
  22. Mokhlis, S., Aleesa, Y., & Mamat, I. (2011). Municipal service quality and citizen satisfaction in southern Thailand. Journal of public administration and governance, 1(1), 122-137. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v1i1.717
  23. Morgeson, F. V., & Petrescu, C. (2011). Do they all perform alike? An examination of perceived performance, citizen satisfaction and trust with US federal agencies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(3), 451-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311407278
  24. Morgeson, F. V. (2012). Expectations, disconfirmation, and citizen satisfaction with the US federal government: Testing and expanding the model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(2), 289-305. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus012
  25. Morgeson, F. (2014). Citizen satisfaction: Improving government performance, efficiency, and citizen trust. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137047137
  26. Noda, Y. (2019). Citizen expectations and satisfaction of service performance: Lessons from subnational governments in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 41(3), 142-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2019.1658361
  27. Oscar Nigro, H., & Elizabeth González Císaro, S. (2014). Prediction of citizen satisfaction with local government based on perceptions of physical disorder. Journal of Place Management and Development, 7(2), 153-175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPMD-09-2013-0021
  28. Pierre Celestin, B. I. M. E. N. Y. I. M. A. N. A. (2020). Testing Citizen Satisfaction in the Local Government: Focusing on the Vision 2020 Umurenge Program in Rwanda.
  29. Reddick, C. G., Perlman, B. J., & Demir, T. (2022). Citizen satisfaction with public service delivery: A test of alternative theories. Canadian Public Administration, 65(2), 352-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12464
  30. Romero-Subia, J. F., Jimber-del Rio, J. A., Ochoa-Rico, M. S., & Vergara-Romero, A. (2022). Analysis of Citizen Satisfaction in Municipal Services. Economies, 10(9), 225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43733-5_26
  31. Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2006). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. springer publishing company.
  32. Siddiquee, N. A., Xavier, J. A., & Mohamed, M. Z. (2019). What Works and Why? Lessons from Public Management Reform in Malaysia. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1390762
  33. Thomassen, J. P., Ahaus, K., Van de Walle, S., & Nabitz, U. (2014). An Implementation Framework for Public Service Charters: Results of a concept mapping study. Public Management Review, 16(4), 570–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.726062
  34. Van de Walle, S. (2018). Explaining Citizen Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction with Public Services BT - The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe (E. Ongaro & S. Van Thiel (eds.); pp. 227–241). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_11
  35. Van Ryzin, Gregg G. (2004). Expectations, Performance, and Citizen Satisfaction with Urban Services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management23(3): 433–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.20020
  36. Van Ryzin, G. G., Muzzio, D., Immerwahr, S., Gulick, L., & Martinez, E. (2004). Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: An application of the American customer satisfaction index model to New York City. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00377.x
  37. Van Ryzin, G. G. (2006). Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 599-611. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui058
  38. Van Ryzin, G. G. (2013). An experimental test of the expectancy‐disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 597-614. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21702
  39. Wang, F., Jun, K. N., & Wang, L. (2021). Bureaucratic contacts and their impact on citizen satisfaction with local government agencies: The influence of expectation. Public policy and Administration, 36(1), 41-68. https://doi.org/1177/0952076719840065
  40. Wang, P., & Fan, F. (2022). Examining and Expanding the Expectancy Disconfirmation Model: Evidence from Rural China. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society. https://doi.org/1155/2022/9378101
  41. Weinberger, M. (2022). What Is Metaverse?—A Definition Based on Qualitative Meta-Synthesis. Future Internet, 14(11), 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi14110310
  42. Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of public administration research and theory, 15(3), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui021
  43. White, C., Hogan, M., Shelley, T., & Unnithan, N. P. (2018). The influence of procedural justice on citizen satisfaction with state law enforcement. Policing: An International Journal, 41(6), 687-703. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-02-2017-0026
  44. Witesman, E. M., Walters, L., & Christensen, R. K. (2023). Creating a public service topology: Mapping public service motivation, public service ethos, and public service values. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12939
  45. Wu, W. N., & Jung, K. (2016). A missing link between citizen participation, satisfaction, and public performance: evidences from the city and county of San Francisco. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 2(4), 392-410. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPSPM.2016.079720
  46. Wu, C., Shi, Z., Wilkes, R., Wu, J., Gong, Z., He, N., ... & Nicola Giordano, G. (2021). Chinese citizen satisfaction with government performance during COVID-19. Journal of Contemporary China, 30(132), 930-944. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2021.1893558
  47. Xu, H., & Zhu, W. (2021). Evaluating the impact mechanism of citizen participation on citizen satisfaction in a smart city. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(8), 2466-2480. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320980746
  48. Yang, Y. (2018). Is transparency a double-edged sword in citizen satisfaction with public service? Evidence from China’s public healthcare. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(4), 484-506. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-06-2017-0102
  49. Zhang, J., Chen, W., Petrovsky, N., & Walker, R. M. (2021). The Expectancy‐Disconfirmation Model and Citizen Satisfaction with Public Services: A Meta‐analysis and an Agenda for Best Practice. Public Administration Review, puar.13368. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13368
مطالعات مدیریت خدمات عمومی
دوره 1، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 2
دی 1402
صفحه 169-195
فایل ها
سابقه مقاله
  • تاریخ دریافت: 06 اسفند 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 30 فروردین 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 11 اردیبهشت 1403
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار