Studies in Public Service Administration

A Typology of Strategies for Mitigating Conflicts of Interest among Parliamentarians of the Islamic Consultative Assembly

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Farajollah Rahnavard 1
Yahya Morattab 2
Hosein Alipour 3

1 Professor, Department Management, Institute for Management and Planning Studies (IMPS), Tehran, Iran.

2 Ph.D Candidate, Department of Management, Institute for Management and Planning Studies (IMPS), Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Department of Management, Institute for Management and Planning Studies (IMPS), Tehran, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22054/spsa.2026.92648.1155
Abstract
Managing conflicts of interest among parliamentarians has been one of the fundamental issues pursued and of concern to parliaments in various countries around the world. Ensuring that parliamentarians pursue the public interest and refrain from personal gain while performing their representative roles is a matter that has preoccupied the minds of many scholars for years. As the sole legislative body of the country, the Islamic Consultative Assembly (Majlis) holds a critical position in setting the course and overseeing the implementation of laws in the country. Consequently, ensuring the management of conflicts of interest among the representatives of the Islamic Consultative Assembly, as well as their conduct and behavior in line with national interests and welfare, like in other countries, requires its own specific rules and regulations. This research, conducted in two phases, seeks to develop a typology of conflict of interest management mechanisms for the representatives of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. In the first phase of the research, through a focus group, 12 policies and laws relevant to the representatives were reviewed and analyzed. In the second phase, 20 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with experts and current as well as former representatives of the Islamic Consultative Assembly. All the obtained data were qualitatively coded using MAXQDA software, and finally, 31 organizing themes were categorized into three overarching themes. The mechanisms for managing conflicts of interest among representatives in their legislative role, supervisory role, and meta-role constitute the overarching themes of this research. Finally, these themes are discussed and analyzed.
1.      Bolleyer, N., & Smirnova, V. (2017). Parliamentary ethics regulation and trust in European democracies. West European Politics, 40(6), 1218–1240. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1290404
2.      Bolleyer, N., Smirnova, V., Di Mascio, F., Natalini, A. (2020). Conflict of interest regulation in European parliaments: Studying the evolution of complex regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance, 14(3), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/REGO.12221
3.      Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
4.      Catchick, P. (2014). Conflict of Interest : Gateway to Corruption. ACFE European Fraud Conference.
5.      Cooper, T. L. (2006). The Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administrative Role (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
6.      Davis, Michael, Stark, & Andrew. (2001). Conflict of Interest in the Professions. Oxford University Press.
7.      Demmke; Christoph, Paulini, M., Autioniemi, J., & Lenner, F. (2020). The Effectiveness of Conflict of Interest Policies in the EU- Member States.
8.      Demmke, C., & Henökl, T. (2007). Managing Conflicts of Interests: Ethics Rules and Standards in the Member States and the European Institutions. European Institute of Public Administration (Maastricht), 3, 1–7. http://aei.pitt.edu/11065/.
9.      Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2009). Disclosure by Politicians. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 14703. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14703
10.  European Research Centre for Anti-Corruption and State-Building. European Public Accountability Index (EuroPAM), Retrieved from http://europam.eu/.
11.  Friedberg, E. (2012). Conflict of interest from the perspective of the sociology of organised action. In A. Peters & L. Handschin (Eds.), Conflict of Interest in Global, Public and Corporate Governance (pp. 39–53). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139248945.004.
12.  Hough, D. (2013). Corruption, Anticorruption and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan.
13.  Kernaghan, K., & Langford, J. (2014). The Responsible Public Servant (second). The Institute of Public Administration of Canada.
14.  King, N., & Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications Ltd.
15.  Li, W. (2024). The Rules of Conflict-of-Interest Management for Public Officials under the “british Model”: A Content Analysis Based on 19 Codes of Ethics. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-2728.
16.  Loewenstein, G. (2011). The limits of transparency: Pitfalls and potential of disclosing conflicts of interest. American Economic Review, 101(3), 423–428.
17.  Mattarella, B. G. (2010). Comparison of legal systems governing conflict of interest. Revue Francaise d’Administration Publique, 135(3), 643–654. [In French]. https://doi.org/10.3917/rfap.135.0643
18.  Nelson, E. L., & Sanyal, K. (2010). Conflict of Interest Issues in Parliament. PRS Legislative Research, November 2009, 1–4.
19.  OECD. (2003). Recommendation of the Council on Guidelines for Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service. OECD Publication.
20.  OECD. (2005). Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Sector: A Toolkit. OECD Publication.
21.  Orr, G. (2019). Parliamentary Disqualification for Financial Conflicts. Federal Law Review, 47(4), 583–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205X19875033.
22.  Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2008). What Is Quality of Government? A Theory of Impartial Government Institutions. Governance, 21(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00391.x.
23.  Seger, A. (2008). Corruption and Democracy: Political Finances, Conflicts of Interest, Lobbying, Justice. Council of Europe Publishing.
24.  Trost, C., & Gash, A. L. (2008). Conflict of Interest and Public Life: Cross-National Perspectives. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/gb/academic/subjects/philosophy/political-philosophy/conflict-interest-and-public-life-cross-national-perspectives.
25.  Jafari Nia, S., Abedi Jafar, H., Vakili, Y., & Ranjbar Kabutarkhani, M. (2021). The Typology of Public Sector Agent Conflict of Interest: Scoping Review of Conflict of Interest Studies in Public Sector. Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies, 5(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.22034/jipas.2022.315287.1289. [In Persian]
26.  Jalili Kenari, M. (2022). The Effectiveness of Conflict of Interest Policies in the EU- Member States. Islamic Parliament Research Center. No: 18566. https://rc.majlis.ir/fa/report/show/1754843. [In Persian]
27.  Zeinaloo, M., Ali Ahmadi, A., Nariman, S. (2019). The causes of advent of conflict of interest among MPs in Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 5(2), 99-117. doi: 10.22059/ppolicy.2019.72274. [In Persian]
28.  Shabani, G. (2025). Constitutional Law and the Structure of Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Ettela'at Publications. [In Persian]
29.  Morattab, Y., Kashafi Nia, V., Abbasi, M., Vaseghi, M., & Fallahian, M. (2020). Conflict of Interest in Public Sector. Transparency & Development Publication. [In Persian]
30.  Morattab, Y., & Yavari, V. (2021). Identifying Transparency Assessment Criteria for Islamic Parliament of Iran. Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies, 4(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.22034/jipas.2021.294315.1197. [In Persian]
31.  Heywood, P. (2018). Political Corruption. Translated by: Mohammad Taheri & Mirghasem Banihashem. Tehran: The Research Institute for Strategic Studies. [In Persian]
Studies in Public Service Administration
Volume 4, Issue 12
Summer 2026
Pages 53-96

  • Receive Date 11 May 2026
  • Revise Date 12 June 2026
  • Accept Date 17 June 2026

Home

Editorial Boards

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us

Article Processing Charges