Integrated Model of Good Governance and Social Capital in Iran's Tax System

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Management, Faculty of Governance and Politics, ZAH.C., Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran.

2 Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran

3 Department of Management, Faculty of Governance and Politics, Zah.C., Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran.

Abstract
The tax system is one of the fundamental pillars of economic governance, playing a crucial role in public revenue generation, social justice, and wealth redistribution. Despite numerous legal and administrative reforms, Iran’s tax system continues to face persistent challenges such as administrative corruption, lack of transparency, tax injustice, bureaucratic inefficiency, and declining public trust, all of which undermine its effectiveness and legitimacy. Accordingly, the present study aims to conceptualize and design an integrated model of good governance and social capital for Iran’s tax system by linking the principles of good governance—including transparency, accountability, equity, administrative integrity, and participation—with the core dimensions of social capital such as trust, social cohesion, participation, and relational capital. The study adopts an applied, qualitative, and exploratory approach and employs thematic analysis to uncover the mental models of experts and develop a conceptual framework for tax governance. Data were collected through 14 semi-structured interviews with tax policy experts, university scholars in public governance, and senior and mid-level managers of the Iranian Tax Administration. Purposeful sampling was conducted based on theoretical saturation. The data were analyzed through open, axial, and selective coding, resulting in the identification of 7 global themes, 15 organizing themes, and 54 basic themes that constitute the final integrated model. The findings indicate that effective tax governance in Iran requires a dynamic interaction between formal governance mechanisms and the soft capacities of social capital. Transparency and accountability play a central role in rebuilding public trust, while tax equity enhances legitimacy through fair tax rates and non-discriminatory regulations. Moreover, voluntary tax compliance is strengthened by social trust, participatory policymaking, digitalized processes, institutional efficiency, and systematic anti-corruption measures. Ultimately, the proposed model redefines the tax system as a socially embedded, participatory, and trust-based institution, providing practical guidance for policymakers seeking sustainable development and legitimate tax governance

1.      Baharuddin, T., Sairin, S., Qodir, Z., Jubba, H. (2021). Publication Trends Related to Social Capital and Governance: Bibliometric Analysis. doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-933363/v2
2.      Canals, A., Cobarsí-Morales, J., Ortoll, E. (2025). Social capital in online environments: Effects of social structure on academic performance in an online university. Online Learning, 29(1), 238–265. DOI:10.24059/olj.v29i1.4388
3.      Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, N., Su, X., Lu, Y., Gao, Y. (2025). Health gap closing function of a green behavioral activity system from the perspective of economic and social capital: A case study of sports governance and operation systems. Evaluation and Program Planning, 111, Article 102580.
4.      De Groot, M., Mihalache, O., & Elfring, T. (2022). Enhancing enterprise family social capital through family governance: An identity perspective. Family Business Review, 35(3), 306–328. DOI:10.1177/08944865221105334
5.      Durante, R., Mastrorocco, N., Minale, L., & Snyder, J. M. (2025). Unpacking social capital. The Economic Journal, 135(667), 773–807.
6.      Knie, W., & Goszczy, W. (2022). Local horizons of governance: Social conditions for good governance in rural development in Poland. European Countryside, 14(1), 27–50. DOI: 10.2478/euco-2022-0002
7.      Liu, Z., Yang, L., & Wang, X. (2024). Neighbourhood social capital and political participation in neighbourhood governance: The case of Beijing, China. Transactions in Planning and Urban Research, 3(1–2), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/27541223241235413
8.      Mirzaei, R. (2023). Improving trust and increasing social capital in political governance by improving governance and satisfaction with the performance of urban management. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Urban Management.
9.      Nutakor, J. A., Zhou, L., Larnyo, E., Addai-Danso, S., & Tripura, D. (2023). Socioeconomic status and quality of life: An assessment of the mediating effect of social capital. Healthcare, 11(5), Article 749.
10.  Ortega, J. A., Pedreira, O., & Piattini, M. (2023). Adaptive Governance Model with a Sociotechnical Approach.
11.  Portes, A. (2024). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. In New critical writings in political sociology (pp. 53–76).
12.  Rusmane, S., & Kudinska, M. (2023). The presence of social capital within public sport governance: The cases of the Baltic States. In Scientific Programme Committee (p. 143).
13.  Sabnur, A. I., Usman, H., & Dasila, R. A. (2025). The effect of the implementation of good governance and internal control on the performance of local government financial management in Palopo City. Journal of Applied Business, Taxation and Economics Research, 4(4), 664–677.
14.  Shamurzaeva, A., & Usonova, T. (2024). Good governance measurement using Rotberg’s output-based approach for Kyrgyzstan. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 17(33), 97–112.
15.  Zaitul, Z., Ilona, D., & Novianti, N. (2023). Good governance in rural local administration. Administrative Sciences, 13(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/27541223241235413
16.  Zhang, S., & Gu, Z. (2021). Impact of Social Capital on Environmental Governance Efficiency—Behavior of Guangdong, China. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 781657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.781657
17.  Abbaszadeh, M., Alizadeh Aghdam, M. B., Hayati, S., Hosseinpour Randi, E. (2025). A sociological study of the interventionist role of social capital in influencing good governance on the perception of the right to the city (case study of citizens over 20 years of age in Maku city). Social Sciences of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 21(4). https://scj.sbu.ac.ir/article_96253.html[In Persian]
18.  Abolhasani-Ranjbar, A., Daneshfard, K., Faghihi, A. (2018). Agenda of administrative system reform policies in Iran based on the role of think tanks and social networks. Public Management Perspective, 9(34), 15–42. doi: 10.22059/jipa.2018.248615.2154[In Persian]
19.  Bahadur, F. (2014). Social Capital and Governance: The Role of Trust in Public Policy Making. 9th International Conference on Management, Accounting, Economics and Social Sciences, Hamadan, Iran. https://civilica.com/l/161183/[In Persian]
20.  Hosseini, S. A., Ghasemi, M., Yaghoubi, N. M., Salarzehi, H. (2014). Identifying and Explaining the Antecedents and Consequences of Smart Governance Using the Fuzzy Delphi Method. Public Management Perspective, 13(2), 91–115. 10.52547/JPAP.2021.222712.1081[In Persian]
21.  Mortazavi, M., Mohammadidoost, H., Dashti, R. (2023). Designing a governance model for the endowment system in Iran (with emphasis on the role of trustees). Journal of Endowment and Charity Studies, 1(1), 171–192. 10.22108/ecs.2023.135396.1030[In Persian]
22.  Rezaei Lori, G., Selajqeh, S., Madadhian, S., Nikpour, A. (2022). Designing a good governance model in industry and mining towards sustainable development with an innovative actions approach. Innovation Management in Defense Organizations, 5(1), 35–58. 10.22034/qjimdo.2021.310857.1454[In Persian]
Volume 4, Issue 12
Summer 2026
Pages 97-136

  • Receive Date 12 February 2026
  • Revise Date 30 April 2026
  • Accept Date 19 May 2026