Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.

2 Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Economics, Management and Administrative Sciences, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran.

10.22054/spsa.2026.90075.1092

Abstract

The research aimed to design and validate a tool to measure client satisfaction at Qom University. The research was applied in terms of orientation and employed a mixed-methods approach (qualitative and quantitative). The research community in the qualitative phase and in the library section included research related to the subject and upstream documents, and in the field section, focus groups consisting of 30 experts. Also, the research community in the quantitative phase was service recipients (students and faculty members) at Qom University. Data collection tools in the qualitative phase included library research, upstream document analysis, and focus group discussions; in the quantitative phase, questionnaires. The sampling method in the qualitative section was purposive, and in the quantitative section, simple random. The sample size in the quantitative section was obtained using the Cochran formula, and service recipients completed 366 questionnaires. The data in the qualitative phase were analyzed using the thematic analysis method, and to complete this process, expert opinions from focus groups were used. Experts examined the scale's content validity, and an exploratory factor analysis was used to assess its construct validity. The instrument's reliability was confirmed by examining the Cronbach's alpha value. Based on the research findings, the prepared instrument comprises the components "interaction", "efficiency", "physical", and "accessibility", with 24 items. The interaction component indicates the quality of human interactions such as attention, empathy, and openness. The efficiency component indicates the transparency and effectiveness of service delivery processes and adherence to work commitments. The physical component relates to environmental conditions and the cleanliness of service providers, while the accessibility component covers in-person and offline access

  1. Al Alyani, W. R. (2024). Exploring models and literature to check student satisfaction as a quality criteria for higher education institution's accreditation. Evaluating Global Accreditation Standards for Higher Education, 129-148.
  2. Algan, Y., Cahuc, P., & Sangnier, M. (2016). Trust and the Welfare State: The Twin Peaks Curve. The Economic Journal, 126(593), 861-883.
  3. Bew, Lord Paul. (2014). Ethical Stand ards for Providers of Public Services Committee on Standards in Public Life.
  4. Brundin, E., Liu, F., & Cyron, T. (2022). Emotion in strategic management: A review and future research agenda. Long Range Planning, 55(4), 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2021.102144
  5. Chen, J., & Sun, L. (2019). Media Influence on Citizens' Government Trust: A Cross-Sectional Data Analysis of China. International Journal of Public Administration, 42 (13), 1122–1134.
  6. Gong, T., Park, J. K., & Hyun, H. (2020). Customer Response toward Employees’ Emotional Labor in Service Industry Settings. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52(C), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101899
  7. Habel, J., Kassemeier, R., Alavi, S., Haaf, P., Schmitz, C., & Wieseke, J. (2020). When do customers perceive customer centricity? The role of a firm’s and salespeople’s customer orientation. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 40(1), 25-42.
  8. Hokka, P., Vähäsantanen, K., & Ikävalko, H. (2023). An Integrative Approach to Emotional Agency at Work. Vocations and Learning, 16(1), 23-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-022- 09299-3
  9. Ibrahim, A. R., Yusup, M., Wicaksono, D. T., & Amalia, P. (2023). Developing A SERVQUAL-Based Scale for Measuring Student Satisfaction with Academic Service in Higher Education. Education Quarterly Reviews, 6(4).
  10. Kim, Hye-Kyung, & Seong, So-Yeon. (2024). Development of a university education satisfaction measurement tool based on student monitoring and analysis of differences according to student characteristics - Focusing on H University major education. Safety Culture Research, 337-352.
  11. King, N. and Horrocks, C. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research.
  12. Lucia-Palacios, L., Pérez-López, R., & Polo-Redondo, Y. (2020). How situational circumstances modify the effects of frontline employees' competences on customer satisfaction with the store. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52(6), 101- 117.
  13. Marimon, F., Mas-Machuca, M., Berbegal-Mirabent, J., & Llach, J. (2019). UnivQual: a holistic scale to assess student perceptions of service quality at universities.Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(2), 184-200.
  14. Monakhova, P., Erikova, M., & Chapurina, N. (2023). Methodological Aspects Of Designing A Subsystem For Monitoring Customer Satisfoction In The University Quality Assessment System, no 6. 85-93.
  15. Nurhidayah, Larasati Sukma.,  &Slamet, Slamet. (2024). Assessment of Students' Satisfaction with Higher Education Services: Customer Satisfaction Index Method. Iqtishoduna: Journal of Islamic Economics and Business, 20 (1). pp. 39-51. ISSN 1829-524X
  16. Olmos-Gómez, M. d. C., Luque-Suárez, M., Castán-García, M.; Portillo-Sánchez, R. (2024). Validation of Educational Quality as a Tool to Measure the Degree of Satisfaction of University Students. Educ. Sci,14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci14010002
  17. Sann, R., Lai, P. C., Liaw, S. Y., & Chen, C. T. (2023). Multidimensional scale development and validation: University service quality (UNIQUAL). Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 6(5), 2565-2594.
  18. Alvani, Seyed Mahdi., & Danaeifard, Hassan. (2017). Discourses on the Philosophy of Governmental Organization Theories. Tehran: Saffar Publications, Third Edition. [In Persian]
  19. Alvani, S. M., & Dede Beigi, M. (2007). The Effect of Emotional Intelligence Training on the Service Quality of Mellat Bank Branches. Iranian journal of management sciences, 2(7), 1-29. [In Persian]
  20. Abbasi Esfanjani, H. (2024). Analytical Model of the Relationship between Employees' Emotional Labor and the Perception of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction in the Organization of Agricultural Jihad of East Azarbaijan Province. Public Organizations Management, 12(3), 1-20. [In Persian]
  21. Davazdah Emami, H., Parvaresh, M., & Sharifi, Saeed. (2022). Presenting a model of client respect in the Isfahan judiciary using a data-based approach. Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Perspectives, 27(99), 257-285. [In Persian]
  22. Farahani, A., Keshavarz, L., & Ghomi, O. (2024). Investigating the Quality of Sports Club Services Based on the SERVQUAL Model: A Case Study of Sports Clubs in Tehran. Sport Management Studies, 16(84), 17-32. doi: 10.22089/smrj.2023.3755. [In Persian]
  23. Ghasemi Banabari, H, R. (2019). Analyzing the dimensions of manager and employee quality in Iranian government organizations: Design and validation of a research measure, PhD thesis in public administration, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
  24. Ghasemi Banabari, F. (2023). Presenting a framework for attracting talent in startups using a qualitative approach, Master's thesis, Management, University of Qom, Qom, Iran. [In Persian]
  25. Gholi pour, A., Ghasemi Banabari, H. R., & Rajabnia Chenari, M. (2024). Analyzing the Strategies of Coping with Bullying in Government Organizations. Public Management Researches, 16(62), 35-62. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2023.44683.5950. [In Persian]
  26. Hashemi, S., & Sabzian, M. (2019). Measuring the satisfaction of the families of martyrs of Najja with the services of veterans' affairs based on the local model (case study: Police Command of Markazi Province). Bi-Quarterly Journal of Police-Social Research on Women and Family, 8(2), 355-380. [In Persian]
  27. Javaherizadeh, E., Ghasemi Banabari, F., & Maleki, M. H. (2024). A framework for identifying and analyzing the factors affecting the recruitment of talents in startups. Journal of Research in Human Resources Management, 16(1), 49-74. [In Persian]
  28. Mozaffari, A. (2014). Customer satisfaction of Shiraz Water and Wastewater Company: Application of Kano model. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 35(1), 1-20. [In Persian]
  29. Parvaresh, M., Davazdahemami, H., & Sharifi, S. (2022). Developing a suitable model for customer respect. Industrial and Organizational Psychology Studies, 9(1), 129-150. [In Persian]
  30. Pedroud, A., Rahnavard, F., & Taherpour Kalantar, H. (2023). Implementing Citizens Charter in government organizations: A meta-synthesis Approach. Majlis and Rahbord, 30(113), 213-252. doi: 10.22034/mr.2022.4927.4754. [In Persian]
  31. Rahimi, A., karimi govareshki, M. H., & bararnia, M. (2024). Providing a model for evaluating the performance of defense educational and research centers using exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Military management quarterly, 24(95), 27-79. doi: 10.22034/iamu.2024.2002946.2886. [In Persian]
  32. Rashidi, S., Jazani, N., & Mobini, M. (2021). Designing an optimal model of public trust in Iranian public organizations with emphasis on the type of organization and the type of client. National Security, 11(41), 371-410. [In Persian]
  33. Rezaian, A., & Ganjali, A. (2011). Performance Management: What, Why and How. Tehran: Imam Sadeq University Press. [In Persian]
  34. Sheikhi, H., & Sultanpanah, H. (2021). Measuring customer satisfaction with the critical multi-criteria decision-making method. Quarterly Journal of Governance and Development, 2(1), 115-127. [In Persian]
  35. Yarahmadi, H., Beiranvand, R., Ahmadi-Moghaddam, E., Adeli, A., & Kiani, J. (2025). Designing a model of a desirable police station in the police command of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Quarterly Journal of Police Management Research, 19(71), 10-42. [In Persian]
  36. Zavaraqi, R., Ghanbari, K., & Atapour, H. (2023). Design and Validation of Data Literacy Assessment Tool for Graduate Students.Sciences and Techniques of Information Management, 9(4), 35-54. doi: 10.22091/stim.2023.8964.1913[In Persian]